Why Our Team Chose to Go Covert to Expose Crime in the Kurdish Population
News Agency
A pair of Kurdish-background men decided to go undercover to uncover a operation behind unlawful commercial enterprises because the criminals are negatively affecting the standing of Kurdish people in the United Kingdom, they explain.
The pair, who we are referring to as Ali and Saman, are Kurdish reporters who have both resided lawfully in the UK for years.
The team uncovered that a Kurdish-linked criminal operation was operating mini-marts, hair salons and car washes across the United Kingdom, and aimed to learn more about how it worked and who was taking part.
Equipped with covert recording devices, Ali and Saman presented themselves as Kurdish asylum seekers with no permission to be employed, attempting to acquire and run a small shop from which to trade illegal tobacco products and vapes.
They were able to uncover how straightforward it is for a person in these circumstances to start and operate a business on the main street in full view. Those participating, we learned, pay Kurdish individuals who have British citizenship to legally establish the operations in their names, helping to deceive the officials.
Ali and Saman also succeeded to secretly record one of those at the core of the operation, who claimed that he could remove government penalties of up to sixty thousand pounds faced those hiring unauthorized employees.
"Personally wanted to play a role in uncovering these illegal operations [...] to say that they do not characterize Kurdish people," states Saman, a former asylum seeker personally. Saman came to the UK illegally, having escaped from Kurdistan - a area that covers the boundaries of multiple Middle Eastern countries but which is not internationally recognised as a state - because his life was at risk.
The journalists recognize that tensions over unauthorized immigration are elevated in the United Kingdom and explain they have both been anxious that the probe could worsen tensions.
But Ali says that the illegal employment "negatively affects the whole Kurdish-origin population" and he considers obligated to "reveal it [the criminal network] out into the open".
Separately, the journalist says he was anxious the coverage could be exploited by the far-right.
He explains this especially impressed him when he noticed that far-right activist Tommy Robinson's Unite the Kingdom rally was happening in the capital on one of the Saturdays and Sundays he was operating covertly. Placards and flags could be seen at the gathering, reading "we demand our country returned".
Saman and Ali have both been tracking online reaction to the inquiry from within the Kurdish-origin population and report it has caused intense frustration for some. One social media post they observed read: "In what way can we locate and track [the undercover reporters] to kill them like animals!"
One more urged their families in the Kurdish region to be harmed.
They have also read accusations that they were agents for the UK authorities, and betrayers to other Kurds. "Both of us are not spies, and we have no aim of harming the Kurdish-origin population," one reporter explains. "Our goal is to uncover those who have compromised its image. We are proud of our Kurdish identity and profoundly concerned about the actions of such persons."
Most of those applying for asylum say they are escaping political persecution, according to an expert from the a refugee support organization, a charity that helps refugees and refugee applicants in the United Kingdom.
This was the situation for our undercover journalist one investigator, who, when he initially arrived to the United Kingdom, struggled for many years. He states he had to live on under twenty pounds a per week while his asylum claim was reviewed.
Asylum seekers now are provided approximately forty-nine pounds a per week - or nine pounds ninety-five if they are in shelter which includes food, according to Home Office policies.
"Realistically saying, this is not enough to sustain a respectable existence," states Mr Avicil from the the organization.
Because asylum seekers are generally prevented from working, he thinks numerous are vulnerable to being taken advantage of and are effectively "compelled to labor in the unofficial market for as little as three pounds per hourly rate".
A official for the Home Office commented: "We are unapologetic for not granting refugee applicants the right to be employed - granting this would create an reason for individuals to migrate to the United Kingdom without authorization."
Refugee applications can take years to be decided with almost a one-third taking over 12 months, according to official data from the spring this year.
The reporter states being employed illegally in a vehicle cleaning service, hair salon or mini-mart would have been very straightforward to do, but he explained to us he would never have engaged in that.
Nevertheless, he says that those he encountered employed in illegal convenience stores during his research seemed "lost", particularly those whose asylum claim has been rejected and who were in the legal challenge.
"These individuals spent all their money to come to the United Kingdom, they had their asylum rejected and now they've lost all they had."
The other reporter acknowledges that these people seemed hopeless.
"When [they] declare you're forbidden to be employed - but simultaneously [you]